Monday, May 15, 2017
Hydraulic fracturing has not contaminated groundwater in northwestern West Virginia, but accidental spills of wastewater could pose a threat to surface water in the region, according to a new study by scientists at Duke University. “Based on consistent evidence from comprehensive testing, we found no indication of groundwater contamination over the three-year course of our study,” said Avner Vengosh, professor of geochemistry and water quality at Duke’s Nicholas School of the Environment. “However, we did find that spill water associated with fracked wells and their wastewater has an impact on the quality of streams in areas of intense shale gas development.”
Vengosh summarized that the study’s bottom-line assessment is that ground water is so far not being impacted, but surface water is more readily contaminated because of the frequency of spills.The peer-reviewed study was published in the European journal Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta in April 2017. The Duke team collaborated with researchers from Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State University, Stanford University, and the French Geological Survey to sample water from 112 drinking wells in north-western West Virginia over a three-year period.
Twenty of the water wells were sampled before drilling or hydraulic fracturing began in the region to provide a baseline for later comparisons. Samples were tested for an extensive list of contaminants, including salts, trace metals, and hydrocarbons such as methane, propane, and ethane. Each sample was systematically analyzed using a broad suite of geochemical and isotopic forensic tracers that allowed the researchers to determine if contaminants and salts in the water stemmed from nearby shale gas operations, from other human sources, or were naturally occurring.
The tests showed that methane and saline ground-water were present in both the pre-drilling and post-drilling well water samples, but that they had a chemistry that was subtly, but distinctly, different from the isotopic fingerprints of methane and salts contained in hydraulic fracturing fluids and shale gas. This indicated that they occurred naturally in the region’s shallow aquifers and were not the result of recent shale gas operations.
“The integrated suite of tracers we used—which were developed at Duke in recent years—provides us with tools sensitive enough to accurately distinguish these subtle differences, which might be missed if you only used a handful of simple measurement techniques,” explained Jennifer Harkness, a recent PhD graduate of Duke’s Nicholas School, who led the study.
Vengosh summarized that the study’s bottom-line assessment is that ground water is so far not being impacted, but surface water is more readily contaminated because of the frequency of spills.The peer-reviewed study was published in the European journal Geochemica et Cosmochimica Acta in April 2017. The Duke team collaborated with researchers from Ohio State University, Pennsylvania State University, Stanford University, and the French Geological Survey to sample water from 112 drinking wells in north-western West Virginia over a three-year period.
Twenty of the water wells were sampled before drilling or hydraulic fracturing began in the region to provide a baseline for later comparisons. Samples were tested for an extensive list of contaminants, including salts, trace metals, and hydrocarbons such as methane, propane, and ethane. Each sample was systematically analyzed using a broad suite of geochemical and isotopic forensic tracers that allowed the researchers to determine if contaminants and salts in the water stemmed from nearby shale gas operations, from other human sources, or were naturally occurring.
The tests showed that methane and saline ground-water were present in both the pre-drilling and post-drilling well water samples, but that they had a chemistry that was subtly, but distinctly, different from the isotopic fingerprints of methane and salts contained in hydraulic fracturing fluids and shale gas. This indicated that they occurred naturally in the region’s shallow aquifers and were not the result of recent shale gas operations.
“The integrated suite of tracers we used—which were developed at Duke in recent years—provides us with tools sensitive enough to accurately distinguish these subtle differences, which might be missed if you only used a handful of simple measurement techniques,” explained Jennifer Harkness, a recent PhD graduate of Duke’s Nicholas School, who led the study.
